I saw this model on display in a major retail store and was quite impressed with its SD picture quality in relation to those around it. Right next to it was a 40W2000 and News 24 looked most satisfactory and marginally less grainy on the 3000’s from a distance of about 9 feet. I also noticed that they have employed a slightly more reflective coating on the W3000 screen. The TV’s were high up on a raised shelf and there was slightly more detail in the fuzzy reflection of the shop lights above the pair of them. This of course wont be a problem in the home and was nowhere near
online payments approaching the mirror-like effects seen on plasma screens. I see what Vince means about the ’spatial filter’ employed in the noise reduction circuitry, the news readers face did have marginally less detail in it on the 3000, but this didnt seem to detract from the overall PQ. Sony have been a bit crafty here by not giving the W3000 100Hz motion flow, instead making us wait and spend more for the X3500 or less for a lower specced D30000. I cant help thinking that 4 months down the line they’ll announce something like a ‘W3500′ with it on, or even what I happened to catch a glimpse of amongst all the hyrogliphics on Sony’s
wireless internet Japanese website, a ‘W5000′ which is actually already out over there. Annoying or what, come on Sony, dont keep all the best sweets for yourselves. Knowing just when to take the plunge in this market is highly frustrating. You just know something better is going to come along just a few wage packets down the line, but the desire to buy is here and now. GRRRR!
For now it looks like
dsl X3500 is going to be the daddy, with its 100Hz and BE Pro picture processing. Trouble is its nearly 12cm wider than the W3000 and it wont fit in my tv space, gutted. We’ll have to wait for the review to see if the motion flow really is that beneficial. From what I’ve seen in the shops with the D3000 its an improvement, but not a huge one.
Keep up the good work HDTVtest, we depend on you.